Revised Conclusion

That's All, Folks!

Sherrill, Dorothy "Little Gray Mouse - The End" (3/4/2013) via Wikimedia. Public Domain.

Just as I have done with my introduction, I will do with my conclusion! I have torn apart my original conclusion and created a new one. I like my newest conclusion because it's longer and more developed than my first conclusion. This conclusion also happens to be a bit more straightforward with my readers, and is geared towards explanation of what they have observed throughout my paper. It specifically Looks Forward at what the audience of my peers can accomplish with the skills that they have acquired over the course of the analysis.

Old Conclusion

By analyzing Margaret Auguste’s opinionated essay, we have come to understand some basic rhetorical strategies and the overall process of rhetorical analysis. Any author will use rhetorical strategies to connect with their audience, build credibility, impact emotional response, and display logic. Each of these specific effects will reinforce an argument. Auguste explains how and why our religion-phobic schooling and society impact youth access to books through personal testimony, compelling narratives, statistics, and scholarly sources. How will you support your own claims about information resources?

New Conclusion

The effective use of rhetorical strategies has an overwhelmingly positive effect on the strength of an author's argument. Any author will use rhetorical strategies to connect with their audience, build credibility, impact emotional response, and display logic. As we were taken through an analysis of Margaret Auguste's essay, we saw how each strategy had a vast diversity in impact on her essay overall. Auguste explains how and why our religion-phobic schooling and society impact youth access to books through personal testimony, compelling narratives, statistics, and scholarly sources. How will you support your own claims about information resources?